To sum up, if you want to play a really involved FPS any call of duty will do ya, however world at war is special and will keep thrilled for much longer than other games. Zombie mode offers a great break while offering merit. The improvements from its predecessors are many although some of the maps don't seem to have been thought through. The multiplayer offers players a long term service and the map packs are a welcome enhancement. The content is much more mature than seen before and this adds to the other-all experience. The graphics are stunning and the gameplay is challenging yet rewarding. As for the single player campaign its 10/10, its lenghty and diverse, it captures you in a atmosphere never seen before in a ww2 shooter. If you stuck in having never played cod4 you would be amazed, having played cod4 it isn't so stunning. If your looking for an opinion on which game is better I honestly couldn't say. I played the game and tried not to compare it to cod4 but as it is so simular it's hard not to. It seems a lot of people are just unhappy that they've gone back to ww2 and that initial annoyance has tarred their judgement. He is the first playable character without a finger in all of the Call of Duty series. Reznov is the seventh playable character to die, though he dies as an NPC.
Reznovs birthday is April 20, the same date as Adolf Hitler. I've read so many articles rubbishing and treyarch and I can't help but wonder if they've even given this game a chance. According to the intel from Call of Duty: Black Ops, Reznov is 511, and 200 pounds, with a 'heavy-set' build.
0 kommentar(er)
